Blog
Details on the Millennium
Tonight we’re going to study Revelation chapter 20 together. It’s such a big subject, that I decided to repost some information from a study guide I use for my high school classes on the Millennium. The main points are below (I recommend looking up all the passages to go with the short explanations), and if you’d like a fuller list of scripture passages to look at for yourself, download the whole thing: Study Guide for the Millennium (Word)
Revelation 20: The Millennium—The 1000-year reign of Christ on the Earth
How we know it’s coming:
First, God made promise to Abraham and David that haven’t been fulfilled:
1. In Genesis 13:14-17, 15:1-21, and 17:1-8 He promised Abraham that his descendants would possess a certain area of land forever (Gen 13:15, 17:8), and He gave the dimensions of the land (Gen 15:18-21).
2 . In 2 Samuel 7:8-16 He promised David that his royal house (his family), his kingdom (Israel) and his throne (his royal power) would last forever. It is reiterated in many places, including Jeremiah 33:17-26.
Second, the Old Testament is full of predictions about this time. You could say the whole Old Testament is looking forward to this time.
See passages like: Ezekiel 37:21-28, Isaiah 11:1-11, Isaiah 60, Micah 4:1-8.
Third, the New Testament teaches that Jesus will fulfill these Old Testament prophecies. The writers of the NT picked up the OT themes and prophecies and showed how they would be completed. They finish the story.
See passages like: Luke 1:29-33, Acts 1:1-8, Acts 13:21-33, Romans 11:25-27, 1 Corinthians 15:20-25
What it will be like:
1. Jesus will be reigning on Earth. (Isaiah 9:6-7, 11:1-5, Jeremiah 23:5-6, Psalm 2, Daniel 7:13-27)
2. Israel will be the chief nation in the earth. (Isaiah 49:22-23, Isaiah 60, Zechariah 8:20-23)
3. Resurrected saints will reign with Christ. (Daniel 7:18 & 27, 2 Timothy 2:12, Rev 5:10, 1 Cor 6:2-3)
4. It will be a rule of righteousness, holiness, justice, and truth. (Isaiah 32:1, Zechariah 14:20-21, Isaiah 59:16-20, Isaiah 61, Micah 4:1-8)
5. The reign of Christ will be full of glory, and the Holy Spirit. (Isaiah 4:2 & 11:1-2)
6. Satan will be bound and gone for the entire time. (Revelation 20:1-3)
7. The curse on the earth will be removed. (Genesis 3:17-19, Isaiah 35, Isaiah 65:25)
8. The Nations will obey Christ, but unbelief will be possible. (Revelation 20:7-10)
Final Thought: Though something better is coming after it, this kingdom will be almost too great for words. Check out this final Old Testament picture of this time: Jeremiah 31:3-14.
Resources for Studying Revelation
As we study through the Book of Revelation on Monday nights, we’re going at a fast enough pace that we’re not to spend time on some of the more complex details in the book, or on the discussions that have surrounded the book throughout church history. Nevertheless, for those of you who’d like to do more study, I want to share some resources that have helped me think about the book of Revelation.
I plan to start collecting them all on one page for easy location. But, for now, here’s three articles you might be interested in. These are from a theological journal, which is an academic journal (like the sources you use for papers in college) published by a seminary or theology department of a university. These particular articles are all written by Robert Thomas, who wrote one of my favorite commentaries on Revelation.
(One note: in these circles, the book of Revelation is often called “The Apocalypse.” Don’t get confused–they’re not talking about the battle of Armageddon or the return of Jesus. They’re talking about the book of Revelation.)
Here you go:
The Structure of the Apocalypse – From the abstract: “The number of divisions of the Apocalypse, a longstanding problematic issue, finds its best resolution in allowing for the structural dominance of the numbered series in the book. Though a theory of recapitulation in dealing with those series has its merits, stronger evidence militates against such a system…Recapitulation does play a supporting role in some of the book’s sections…but the overall scheme of the book is that of progression, not repetition.”
(Translation: The structure of the book of Revelation helps you interpret it, and understanding that the book does not retell the same story several times helps you know what’s going on as the action progresses.)
The Kingdom of Christ in the Apocalypse – From the abstract: “In spite of admitted limitations in knowledge about the future, a fairly good understanding of the kingdom of Christ as it is portrayed in the last book
of the Bible is possible. Though allowance is made for a present aspect of the kingdom, the time of the kingdom in its ultimate form is clearly future. The location of the kingdom is fixed in the earthly sphere rather than a heavenly one. The nature of the kingdom is political and outward in the common understanding of the terms and not merely spiritual and hidden… The span of the kingdom covers the period between Christ’s second coming and the creation of the new heavens and new earth, a period of one thousand years on earth as it is now known, and then an unlimited phase after the new creation.”
(Translation: We don’t have to settle for thinking that we can’t really get any details about the future from the book of Revelation. For instance, the Millennial reign of Christ on the earth is real, and it’s awesome.)
Promises to Israel in the Apocalypse – From the abstract: “Recent opinions that Israel’s covenants and promises are missing in Revelation 20:1-10 have rested on poor hermeneutical foundations. Three major OT covenants with Israel are prominent throughout the Apocalypse and therefore are foundational to what John writes in chapter 20. God promised Abraham a people who are quite visible in Revelation 7, 12, and 14, and in 2:9 and 3:9, where physical descendants of Abraham are in view. The geographical territory promised to Abraham comes into view in 11:1-13 as w ell as in 16:16 and 20:9. Close attention is given to the Davidic Covenant in 1:5 and 22:16 and many places between, such as 3:7, 5:5, and 11:15. The New Covenant comes into focus whenever the Lamb and His blood are mentioned in the book, and particularly in 21:3 which speaks of a new relationship with God. Obvious references to God’s covenants with Israel are often ignored because of deviations from sound principles of interpretation by those who practice what has been called eclectic hermeneutics. According to Revelation, God will in the future be faithful in fulfilling His promises to Israel.”
(Translation: When John writes about Israel in the book of Revelation, he means Israel–not the church.)
The Seven Letters from Jesus
Last night we looked at the first three chapters of the book of Revelation. I mentioned (and put up on screen) a breakdown of the seven letters in chapters two and three that showed their parallel structures. Seeing the structure is helpful for getting a sense of the overall message of all seven, taken as a group. If you’re interested in looking over it yourself, click on the link below:
A Visual Breakdown of the Seven Letters in Revelation 2 and 3
Prayer empowered by the Spirit
The passage below is from Gordon Fee’s book God’s Empowering Presence. Here he’s discussing Paul’s direction in the “Armor of God” passage (in Ephesians chapter six) for believers to be “praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit…”
Fee points out that, “Paul considered prayer to be above all an activity that empowered by the Spirit.”
Prayer–an activity empowered by the Spirit. The Holy Spirit should empower our praying. Is that your experience?
Fee helps us see more in Ephesians 6:18 too…
It also indicates the crucial role the Spirit plays in our continuing “warfare” against Satan. For Paul, the concern was not only that they be clothed with the armor that Christ provides in the gospel, but that they take the enemy on by Spirit-embowered proclamation and by Spirit-inspired praying. The context is that of conflict, warfare against “the prince of darkness grim”; only “praying in the Spirit” will suffice in such conflict.
Perhaps we should note further that the feeble prayers of God’s people, spoken in their own strength and often in desperation, while [it is true that they are] heard on high, [they] are surely not the stuff of “routing the foe.” Because we do not know how to pray as we ought, we need to lean more heavily on “praying in/by the Spirit,” however one is to understand that phrase.
Prayer is not simply our cry of desperation or our “grocery list” of requests that we bring before our heavenly Abba; prayer is an activity inspired by God himself, through his Holy Spirit. It is God siding with his people and, by his own empowering presence, the Spirit of God himself bringing forth prayer that is in keeping with God’s will and his ways.
I don’t know about you, but I find these thoughts to be an encouragement to press deeper into what God has for us in prayer.
“That’s just your interpretation.”
Don Carson is arguably the leading living New Testament scholar. Here he helps us think through what to say when we’re speaking to someone about Jesus or truth or the Bible, and the reply we get is, “Well that’s just your interpretation.”
Either Messiah, or Nothing At All.
In Mathew 16 Jesus we have it recorded that once Jesus turned to his disciples and asked them directly, “Who do you say that I am?” It’s hard, when you read that, not to feel it leap off the page and directly address you, as if Jesus turned to you and asked it.
…which is where Thomas Oden is coming from, with this:
You. “Who do you say that I am?”
This is the startling question that Jesus’ life constantly asks. The nearer anyone comes to him, the more clearly he requires decision. It is the unavoidable issue that the observer of Jesus’ life must finally struggle with. For Jesus himself presses the question and awaits an answer.
To avoid the issue is to avoid him.
To avoid him is to avoid Christianity altogether. Transformations occur when we listen. The closer we make him the object of our study, the more we become aware that he is examining us.
The evangelists’ portraits of his life, offered by eyewitnesses, are poignant, simple, and stirring. He was born of a poor family, of a destiny-laden but powerless nation. The earliest traditions report that he was born in a squalid cave or stable among animals in an out-of-the-way village. He immediately became the refugee baby of a fleeing family seeking to escape a wave of killing. The town he grew up in had the reputation that “nothing good could ever come from there.” He spoke a language (Aramaic) that few spoke then, and now has been virtually forgotten.
He is never said to have written anything except with his finger in the sand. He worked with his hands as a common laborer. He owned nothing of value. To the poor he brought good news of the coming governance of God. His disciples were simple folk, involved in artisan trades. They included some reprobates whose lives were reshaped by their unforgettable meeting with him. Even in the face of cynical criticism, he did not cease to dine and converse with outcasts, to mix with the lowly and disinherited. He washed the feet of his followers. He intentionally took the role of a servant. He reached out to other cultures despised by his own people. Of all people who might have been able to grasp the fact that he was to be anointed to an incomparable mission, it turned out to be “woman who was a sinner.”
Remarkable things were reported of him. He touched lepers. He healed the blind. He raised persons from the dead. These events pointed unmistakably to the unparalleled divine breakthrough that was occurring in his people’s history – the decisive turnaround in the divine-human story of conflicted love.
He heralded a new age. He called all his hearers to decide for or against God’s coming reign. He himself was the sign of its coming. He called for complete accountability to God. His behavior was consistent with his teaching. He was born to an ethnic tradition widely despised and rejected; but he himself become even more despised and rejected by many of his own people.
His enemies plotted to trap him and finally came to take his life. His closest friends deserted him when his hour has come to die. He knew all along that he would be killed. Sweat poured from his face as he approached death. He was betrayed by one of his closest associates. He submitted to a scurrilous trial with false charges.
His end was terrible. His back felt the whip. He was spat upon. His head was crowned with thorns. His wrists were in chains. On his shoulders he bore a cross through the city. Spikes were driven through his hands and feet into wood. His whole body was stretched on a cross as he hung between two thieves. All the while he prayed for his tormentors, that they might be forgiven, for they knew not what they were doing.
He rose from the dead.
This is a sketch of the Gospel’s portrait of Jesus. It is this one whom the disciples experienced as alive on the third day after his death. This is the unique person whose extraordinary life we now try to understand.
How is it plausible that two thousand years ago there lived a man born in poverty in a remote corner of the world, whose life was abruptly cut short in his early thirties, who traveled only in a small area, who held no public office, yet whose impact upon us appears greater than all others? How is it that one who died the death of a criminal could be worshiped as Lord by billions?
This is the surprising paradox of his earthly life, but even this is not its deepest mystery. Why are people willing to renounce all to follow him and even die in his service? How is it possible that centuries later his life would be avidly studied, and worshipers would address their prayers to him? What accounts for this surprising relation he has with this community?
Classic Christian teaching answers without apology: what was said about him then is true now; he actually was:
Son of God,
Promised Messiah,
the one Mediator between God and humanity,
truly God
truly human, who liberated humanity from the power of sin by his death on the cross,
who rose from the dead to confirm his identity as the promised one.
That answer better explains what his life is and means than any of its alternatives. It is theoretically possible for the study of Jesus to function without that basis, but in practice it is exceptionally difficult, for one is then forced to stretch and coerce the narratives to make any sense of them at all. The New Testament documents give determined resistance to any reader who discards that hypothesis (Jesus is Lord) because they imagine that they know a better explanation of his true identity. There is no other or better way to explain this amazing life.
According to Christian confession, Jesus is either Messiah or nothing at all.
(from Classic Christianity, p. 215-217)
Speaking Truth in Our Hearts
“Lord, who may abide in Your tabernacle?” asks the writer of Psalm 15, and “Who may dwell in Your holy hill?” The answers are profound. One of them is, “He who speaks truth in his heart.”
Speaking truth in your own heart–that’s a very interesting thing to mull over. The people who may live in God’s presence are people who speak truth inwardly–in their own hearts. They tell themselves the truth. The don’t keep lies hanging around in their own heads.
Charles Spurgeon’s A Treasury of David includes a section where he collects other people’s writing’s on each verse of the Psalms. He has this meditation by Benjamin Bennet in my copy. Enjoy…
I this day heard a sermon from Psalm 15:2 “And speaketh the truth in his heart.” … O my soul, receive the admonition that has been given thee! Study truth in the inward parts; let integrity and truth always accompany thee and preserve thee: speak the truth in thy heart.
I am thankful for any conviction and sense I have of the evil of lying; Lord, increase my abhorrence of it: as further assistance and help against this mean, sordid, pernicious vice, I would endeavor and resolve, in pursuit of the directions laid before us in the sermon, to mortify those passions and corruptions from whence this sin of lying more ordinarily flows, and which are the chief occasion of it, as “out of the heart proceed evil thoughts” (Matthew 15:19); so, from the same fountain proceed evil words.
And I would, with the greatest zeal, set myself against such corruptions as upon observation I find more commonly betray me into this iniquity: pride often indites our speech, and coins many a lie; so envy, covetousness, malice, etc. I would endeavor to cleanse myself from all this filthiness: there never will be a mortified tongue while there is an unmortified heart.
If I love the world inordinately, it is a thousand to one I shall be often stretching a point to promote a worldly interest; and if I hate my brother, it is the same odds I shall reproach him. Lord, help me to purge the foundation, and then the streams will be pure. When the spring of a clock, and all the movements are right, the hand will go right; and so, it is here. The tongue follows the inward inclination. I would resolve to do nothing that may need a lie. If Gehazi’s covetousness had not shamed him he had not wanted a lie to excuse him.
“He that walks uprightly, walks surely,” and safely in this, as well as other respects (Proverbs 10:9). May I do nothing that is dishonorable and mean, nothing that cannot bear the light, and then I shall have little temptation to lying. I would endeavor for a lively sense of the eye of God upon me, acting and speaking in his presence. Lord, I desire to set thee always before me; thou understandest my thoughts as perfectly as other so my words. I would consider before I speak, and not speak much or rashly (Proverbs 29:20). I would often think of the severity of a future judgement, when every secret shall be made manifest, and the hypocrite and liar exposed before angels and men.
Lastly, I would frequently beg divine assistance herein (Psalm 119:29, Proverbs 30:8). O my God, help me in my future conduct, remove from me the way of lying; may the law of kindness and truth be in my past miscarriages in this respect, and flee to thy mercy through the blood of Christ; bless to me the instructions that have been this day given me; let no iniquity prevail against me; “keep back thy servant from presumptuous sins, and cleanse me from secret faults.”
I commit my thoughts, desires, and tongue to thy conduct and government; may I think and act in thy fear, and always speak the truth in my heart.
A Simple Way to Understand the Trinity
Everything Fred Sanders writes or says about the Trinity is helpful, encouraging, and worthwhile.
For instance, this great book.
And this lecture.
And this post.
And, here he is, in under three minutes, explaining the simplest way to understand the Trinity:
Not a Narrow or Dated Subject
I plan on reading this quote tonight during the study, but it’s so good, I wanted to post it here too.
Is it true that “repent” is an important part of the Christian message? Or, as many today would say, does it totally misrepresent Jesus and his love to talk about repentance to our friends and neighbors who don’t yet know Christ?
Here are some thoughts from Thomas Oden, whose book Classic Christianity, collects scripture and insights from the first few hundred years of Christianity into incredibly helpful discussions of topics which range across the whole range of Christian thought. Oden observes:
To make the call to repentance and faith plausible is the task of Christian preaching. When neglected, every other aspect of the mission of the church stands imperiled. Preaching that lacks the courage to call hearers to repent is tedious and timid. Theology that lacks the capacity for admonition smells of hypocrisy.
The purpose of preaching is to draw the hearer toward saving faith in God. That faith can only begin with repentance. It is in the repentance of one sinner that heaven rejoices. This is not a narrow or dated subject.
There reigns in the broken human heart a feeling of discord, a lack of congruence between what is and what ought to be. Christian preach does not sidestep this feeling of incongruence, but faces it openly. The crushed heart must be relieved by confession of sin. The longing for peace, the earnest desire for truth, the penetration of self-deceptions, the hunger for freedom from a life of sin is the direct concern of Christian testimony.
Every resource of language is employed to make the requirement of God as clear as possible and the eventful love of God palpable and real.
That is, I think, a helpful meditation on the history of Christian obedience to the command of Jesus recorded in Luke 24–“that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be proclaimed in his name to all nations.“
Christ is Lord–Even on the Moon
My wife went to a presentation on the first moon landing by a Franklin Institute astronomer the other day, and he went out of his way to mention that Buzz Aldrin had taken communion while they were landed on the moon. I had never heard of this before. It’s such an amazing image–a man literally on the moon, acknowledging the Lordship of Christ, even way up there. Jesus knew, when he instituted the practice, that one day a man would remember his death–on the moon!
It must be something people are talking about–because then, Pastor Joe sent me a link to this video. Check it out: