Blog

Five Digital Dangers

“But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires. (Romans 13:14).” — That’s how John Piper starts his helpful list of five things we must be on guard for in our world of digital connectedness. Check it out:

 1: The hook of constant curiosity

Digital devices offer a never-ending possibility for discovery. Even the basic operating systems can consume hours of curious punching and experimenting. Then there are the endless apps consuming weeks of your time as they lure you into their intricacies.

All this is very deceptive, giving the illusion of power and effectiveness, but leaving you with a feeling of emptiness and nervousness at the end of the day.

Resolution: I will strictly limit my experimental time on the device and devote myself more to the truth than to technique.

2: The empty world of virtual (un)reality

How sad to see brilliant, creative people pouring hours and days of their lives into creating cities and armies and adventures that have no connection with reality. We have one life to live. All our powers are given to us by the real God for the real world leading to a real heaven and real hell.

Resolution: I will spend my constructive, creative energy not in the unreality of “virtual reality” but in the reality of the real world.

3: “Personal” relations with a machine

Like no other invention, a computer comes closest to being like a person. You can play games with it. It will talk to you. It will always be there for you. The great danger here is that we really become comfortable with this manageable electronic “person,” and gradually drift away from the unpredictable, frustrating, sometimes painful dealings with humans persons.

Resolution: I will not replace the risk of personal relationships with impersonal electronic safety.

4: The risk of tryst

“Tryst” (noun: An agreement (as between lovers) to meet.) Sexual affairs begin in private time together, extended conversation, and the sharing of soul, which can now be done in absolute seclusion through digital devices. You can think that “it’s just nothing” — until she shows up in town.

Resolution: I will not cultivate a one-on-one relationship with a person of the opposite sex other than my spouse. If I am single I will not cultivate such a relationship with another person’s spouse.

5: Porn

More insidious that X-rated videos, we can now not only watch but join the perversity in the privacy of our own den. Interactive porn will allow you to “do it” or make them “do it” virtually.

I have never seen it. Nor do I ever intend to. It kills the spirit. It drives God away. It depersonalizes women. It quenches prayer. It blanks out the Bible. It cheapens the soul. It destroys spiritual power. It defiles everything.

Resolution: I will never open any app for sexual stimulation nor purchase or download anything pornographic.

What does “Love Your Neighbor Mean”…? (Notes from last night)

Last night we looked at what Jesus calls the second greatest commandment: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

Since most of the study was group discussion, the notes are sparse, but here they are, with the scripture references and questions we discussed:

Matthew 22:37-40  What might most people think the “Second” commandment means? What do you think it means?

Romans 13:8-10  How does Paul’s use of this commandment add to or change your thought about what it means?

Leviticus 19:1-16   The theme of Leviticus 19: “Be Holy for I am Holy”  (v.2) How should we do this? The answer given in v. 1-16 fall in to these categories: devout worship, honesty, integrity, justice, charity, love

v.3     Revere parents
v.4-8    Remain loyal to God (no idols, acceptable offerings, worship from the heart)
v.9-10    Care for the Poor
v.11-12    Honesty to others
v.13-14    Don’t exploit others
v.15-16    live justly with others

Notice, Leviticus 19:17-18 is 1 big commandment: “Don’t hate (v.17), but do love (v.19).”

In between these two halves are four details:

1. “reason frankly with” or “rebuke” your neighbor
2. Don’t incur sin from others
3. don’t take revenge
4. don’t hold a grudge

How does v. 17-18 relate to v 1-16?
What do each of the four things in between “hate” and “love” tell you about this commandment to love your neighbor?
So how does all of this deepen, expand, and shape what we see Jesus means when Jesus tells us to love our neighbor?

Summing this up: In Leviticus we see that to “love your neighbor” is to see yourself as part of a community in such a way that you feel impacted and involved by what is happening around you. So you not only care for people materially, when they are overtaken by physical hardship (Luke 10:25-37), but you also talk with them when their sin will bring pain on them. You understand their sin affects the whole community, so you don’t incur sin on yourself by refusing to care about what’s happening in your community. You won’t get bitter or seek revenge, but you will talk openly to people in ways that will help them escape sin and it’s consequences. (see Romans 12:9-21, 13:8-14).

How different this bigger view of love is than what might usually pass for “loving your neighbor” in our wider culture.

Resources for Ministering to Muslims

Monday’s forum on sharing the gospel with Muslims went very well.

Here’s the list of resources we were talking about for further study:

Books

Answering Islam by Norman Geisler & Abdul Saleeb
The Messenger, The Message, and the Community by Roland Mueller
Islam Uncensored  by Jeff King (International Christian Concern)
The Qur’an  (choose translation by Yusuf Ali or Pickthall)
The Life of Muhammad by Albert Guillaume (considered by Muslims to be the most authoritative English version) For a topical study of book see Word Document Link at the bottom of this page: http://answeringislam.org/authors/silas.html
The Qur’an Revealed by Robert C. Greer, Ph.D (an English translation with study notes, Suras arranged in chronological order)
What the Qur’an Reveals by Robert C. Greer, Ph.D. (a companion to The Qur’an Revealed)
Raymond Lull, First Missionay to the Moslems by Samuel Marinus Zwemer
Henry Martyn: Pioneer Missionary to India and Islam by Jesse Page

Muslim Apologetics Online

www.answering-islam.org  (especially writings by John Gilchrist)
www.debate.org.uk/topics/trtracts/home.htm
• http://debate.org.uk/new/
http://www.pray4muslimpeoples.org
http://muslimjourneytohope.com/watch.asp

Islamic Studies Online

http://www.i2ministries.org
https://www.crescentproject.org

The Persecuted Church

http://www.persecution.com
http://www.persecution.org

Resources for Women

Woman to Woman: Sharing Jesus with a Muslim Friend
Behind the Veils of Yemen: How an American Woman Risked Her Life, Family, and Faith to Bring Jesus to Muslim Women
Miniskirts, Mothers, and Muslims: A Christian Woman in a Muslim Land
I Dared to Call Him Father: The Miraculous Story of a Muslim Woman’s Encounter with God
In the Land of Blue Burqas
Voices Behind the Veil: The World of Islam Through the Eyes of Women

Do finite sins deserve eternal punishment?

“Do you think finite sins deserve eternal punishment? How can that be fair?”

It’s a common question we may hear when we’re seeking to understand or discuss the nature of God’s wrath as it’s described in the Bible. And on the surface, it presents a difficult problem. After all, if you commit sin for a period of, say, eighty years, does it seem fair to be sentenced to an eternity of punishment? When stated this way, we might feel there is some sort of disparity. It’s hard to image a just God making this sort of mistake. In fact, it might seem to get worse when we think of each sin individually…maybe the sin lasted a year, or a day, or just a few minutes. How could it merit punishment forever?

And yet, that’s what the Bible does teach about the nature of God’s wrath on those who die in their sins. It’s a tragic, horrifying truth to try to contemplate, but it is the case.

So, what gives? Is God unfair?

Two things help when trying to think this through. First, it helps to ask questions about how we determine what a “fair” punishment is in the first place. Second, it helps to think about the assumptions we might be making about the “eternal” or “temporary” nature of both humans and their sins.

So, when we ask, “Do finite sins deserve infinite punishment?”–we should realize that we first need to answer the question of how someone would assign punishment to a crime at all. Even on a purely human level, do we assign length of punishment to a crime based on how long it took to commit the crime? The answer is generally no. If a murder took 5 minutes to commit, the time factor does not weigh in to the length of punishment. Imagine the trial of someone who spent 5 years masterminding a plot to steal $100,000, and someone who killed several people in 10 minutes of rage. Which one would receive a more severe punishment?

So we see that the length of time it takes to commit a crime, or a sin, is not really something that is taken into account when we think of punishment.

How should we weigh evil acts, then? The answer typically has to do with a mix of the amount of evil committed (money stolen, property damaged, lives disrupted or taken, pain caused), the amount of deliberateness behind the evil (time spent planning, amount of intent to do harm), and some other factors, like the future danger to a society the individual presents. The crucial idea to see here is that even our court systems understand that human acts have consequences beyond the actual committing of the crime. The evil caused does not stop when the criminal stops committing the evil.

So we have a compounding effect of evil to take into account when we assess punishment to criminals. If someone hurt several people badly enough to disable them, we have on our hands effects of evil which will last for the rest of their lives. Would it be unfair to add together the remaining years of each injured person’s life to come up with a “fair” number of years the criminal should be punished? (We should see that we will quickly run out of years left for the criminal, so that he or she wouldn’t even be able to serve the “full” sentence, thinking this way.)

And it gets worse. How would we calculate the “fair” amount of punishment for someone like Adolph Hitler? The amount of evil he committed would need to be assessed over the scale of every life he affected, his amount of malice and conscious intent, and how lasting the effects of his sin were. It boggles the mind. Could he receive a sentence that was “fair” which he could serve in his lifetime?

Secondly, when we ask the question, “”Do finite sins deserve infinite punishment?”–we should notice the underlying assumptions about humans, and our relationship to eternity, that we may need to reexamine. Specifically, we need to contemplate three issues of our own interaction with eternity:

1. The eternal nature of humans.
2. The eternal significance of the things humans do.
3. The eternal authority humans are under.

Let’s look at each one individually.

1. The eternal nature of humans: We’re finite in terms of size, but in terms of time, are we finite, or eternal? The answer the Bible gives is that we are eternal. Humans, by nature, are made in the image of the eternal God, which means that once we come into existence, we never pass out of existence. To exist forever is in the very fabric of what it means to be human. In other words, and this is very helpful to say when we discuss these kinds of things, we are eternal beings.

So when a human commits a sin, it is a sin committed by an eternal being. A new question emerges: Can an eternal being commit a finite sin?

2. The eternal significance of the things human do: Do our acts have temporary, or eternal significance? This returns to an idea discussed above–how long do the effects of our sin last? Now, I may break someone’s arm, and it may heal in six weeks. We could say the effects of my sin lasted six weeks. In one sense that’s true. But in another sense it’s not true at all. How long do the memories of that sin last? How long does the animosity between me and the injured person last? And to get more to the point: once I’ve broken the arm, can I ever undo that action? Is there a way I can make it so I didn’t do it at all? This is why the idea of “significance” is so helpful. I may commit an act whose effects go away after some time, but I can never change the universe so that the act didn’t happen. The fact that I broke the arm is an eternal fact. There will never be a time when I did not break that arm.

Further, think about things we do whose effects don’t go away. What if I hurt someone and it cost them their arm? They will live for the rest of their life maimed by what I did. And since we each only live one life, they will never get to live a full life with both arms. In other words, what I did effects them eternally. There will never be a reality in which they lived a full life with two arms.

Let’s keep going. If I murder someone, think of the eternal results of what I’ve done. For all eternity, the length of their earthly life will have been shortened, by me. They will never get to relive an earthly life which lasts its full course.

These may seem like extreme cases, but once you realize the connection between the fact that we only have one life to live, and that we can not change the past once we’ve lived it, you realize that literally everything we do has eternal significance. Once I say, think, or do something, it, and all its effects, can never be undone. they are just there, forever. I think we’ve answered the next pertinent question: Can an eternal being commit any act that is not eternal in significance?

3. The eternal authority humans are under: Against whom do we sin, when we sin? This is probably the most common way of connecting eternity to our sins. We don’t simply sin against each other–we sin against an infinite, eternal God, who gave us existence and has absolute right to rule over us. Not only that, but He’s shown Himself to be infinitely, eternally loving as well, so when we sin, we sin again someone with both infinite authority and infinite love. We offend infinite majesty. Here’s another question: Can an eternal being commit a finite sin against infinite love and authority?

I think adding the rest of what we’ve seen to this helps even further: Here we are, eternal creatures, given the gift of true existence with eternal significance, so that all we are and all we do has meaning forever. We’re under the infinitely loving authority of our creator as well, and given the ability to act out, in truly significant ways, our desires and intentions. Everything we do, then, has eternity all over it. There’s nothing about us that doesn’t matter, forever.

And when we sin, we sin eternally. We’re eternal beings committing eternally significant sins against an eternal authority.

When seen in this light, I’m not sure how we could see anything other than eternal consequences as appropriate. Eternal punishment speaks to the high calling and intention of God for Man, and the amazing level of significance he has gifted to us. To whom much is given, much is required.

And doesn’t this bring one more thing into glorious light? The grace of God in Jesus Christ is the kind of grace that comes to us–these eternally guilty beings–and actually has the power to change what we never could. Yes, there will never be a time when I did not sin, but by the death and resurrection of Christ I can be given the status of One who never did. When I am united to Him by faith, I find my past covered and atoned for, and what’s left is for me to live out an eternally significant life of righteousness. This is staggering.  If anything, contemplating the reality of what Hell teaches us should make us be more in awe of what Jesus truly accomplished. What a massive, unimaginable salvation is offered to us. God is that good.

(Note: For more discussion of how the love of God impacts these things, see this post.)

YA Camping Trip: 5/31-6/2

FB poster campingWe’ll be taking our annual trip to Ricketts Glenn this year on the weekend of May 31 – June 2. (We still have the pictures from last year’s trip at the bottom of the website!)

We’re also inviting the young adults groups from The Calvary Chapels in Quakertown and Germantown.

Click here to download the registration flyer.

Want to register online?

register-here

Here’s some info:

Ricketts Glen harbors Glens Natural Area, a National Natural Landmark. Take the Falls Trail and explore the Glens, which boasts a series of wild, free-flowing waterfalls, each cascading through rock-strewn clefts in this ancient hillside. The 94-foot Ganoga Falls is the highest of 22 named waterfalls. Old growth timber and diverse wildlife add to the scenic area. Ricketts Glen State Park is one of the most scenic areas in Pennsylvania. This large park is comprised of 13,050 acres in Luzerne, Sullivan and Columbia counties. For more information about the park visit the website.

General Schedule:

Friday, May 31:  There will be a group leaving Calvary Philly in the morning (around noon) and another group leaving in the afternoon (around 5:00 p.m.) Non Calvary Philly Groups work out travel amongst yourselves…

Sunday, June 2:  We will be returning before 5:00 PM

Transportation: We will have limited availability for transportation to and from the campground.  Plan on carpooling.

Park Location: Ricketts Glen State Park; 695 State Route 487, Benton, PA  18656
(570) 477-5675

What To Bring:
Bible
Snacks, Water Bottle (meals included in price)
Camera
Camping Gear/Tents/Sleeping Bags
Rain Gear
Towels, Toiletries
Fishing Gear (license required)
Football/Sports Equipment/Hiking Gear

Three Great Books

We’ve wrapped up our look at the Trinity on Monday nights, but I’ve been meaning to share the books I read in conjunction with my studying for the couple months we spent there. They are all great, but they are all different, and if you want to read one of them, the choice really depends on what you’re looking for.

Medium: The Deep Things of God: How the Trinity Changes Everything, by Fred Sandersdeep-things-of-god

This was my favorite of the three, and my highest recommendation. If you just read one book on the Trinity, read this one. Sanders does an excellent job of taking you from what you already know of God in your personal salvation, spiritual walk, and bible reading, and leading you on to show you how you’ve already encountered and known God as a Trinity. (200+ pages)

Long: The Holy Trinity: In Scripture, History, Theology, and Worship, by Robert Letham Letham Trinity

This was the longest of the three, and the most comprehensive. If you want to cover what the Bible says about the Trinity, staritng with the Old Testament, and then look extensively at the history of the doctrine in the church (including modern theologians) and end with some application, this is for you. If you are into this sort of thing, the history is fascinating. (500+ pages)

Short: Delighting in the Trinity: An Introduction to the Christian Faith, by Mike Reeves. Reeves-Delighting-in-Trinity

This was the shortest of the three I read. While it’s a good book, I found the other two more helpful, and I can’t recommend Reeves’ audio messages on the Trinity highly enough. But for a quick read that get’s you into the exciting idea of God’s Triune nature, this is a fine place to start. (100+ pages)

Finally, I’ll sign off with this awesome quote from Gregory Nazianzen:

Before all else, I beg you…hold fast to the confession of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

I give you to share, and to defend all your life, the one Godhead and power, found in the Three in unity, and comprising the Three separately, not unequal in substance or nature, neither increased nor diminished by superiorities or inferiorities; in every respect equal, in every respect the same.

This is the infinite conjunction of three infinite Ones, each is God when considered in Himself; as the Father, so the Son; as the Son, so the Holy Spirit.

No sooner do I conceive of the One than I am illumined by the splendour of the Three; no sooner do I distinguish them than I am carried back to the One.

When I think of any One of the Three I think of him as the Whole, and my eyes are filled, and the greater part of what I am thinking of escapes me.

I cannot grasp the greatness of that One so as to attribute a greater greatness to the Rest.

When I contemplate the Three together, I see but one torch, and cannot divide or measure out the Undivided Light.

An easy way to make a connection

This Monday we’ll have an evening to discuss sharing the Gospel with Muslims. Many of you might immediately have people on your mind from work or school who you want to be better equipped to speak with.

But for any of you who are looking for ways to make new connections, with Muslim students in particular, here’s an interesting opportunity: Drexel University  runs something they call the Coversation Network. Their description:

The Conversation Network is a unique opportunity for language and cultural exchange. It provides a forum for Drexel students to meet and interact with English Language Center (ELC) students. Native English speakers can help an ELC student practice English while the ELC student helps the English speaker learn a second language. Or the exchanges may focus on other areas like life in other countries, customs, cultural differences, or cross-cultural communication. You can find a partner whose interests match your own. You may sign up for the Conversation Network using the online form.

The Conversation Network tries to match conversation partners for people who participate in the program. We also provide a list of the participants that includes their names, native language(s), language(s) they are interested in practicing, areas of interest, gender, preferred meeting times, and e-mail addresses. For anyone we cannot match, it is up to the participants to look for potential partners and contact them by e-mail.

Then it will be up to you and your partner to decide the rules: when and where to meet; when to speak in one language and when to speak in the other; whether you only want to practice language or want to do other things too, like go to the movies, cook, play games, etc.

The ELC hosts a Conversation Network party during the second or third week of each term so all our participants can meet each other. Check the website or watch your e-mail for the date, time and place. There’s always free pizza, soda, games and lots of new people to meet.

Right now they’re signing up language conversation partners for students, and they have Arabic speaking students that need practice with English. If you’re interested in finding out more, click here.

Material from This Past Weekend

We had a great time away this last weekend. Long times together discussing Philippians, and it was great to be with all of you who were there. If you are interested at all, I wanted to make the booklet from the weekend available. It can be used for a self-study through the whole letter, so you can get in to, on your own, what we got in to this weekend. Click on the link below to download the book.

A Weekend Study in Philippians (pdf)

The Next Forum: Sharing the Gospel with Muslims

slider_islam2

On April 29th we’ll have our next installment of the Young Adults Forum. Last January we held a similar night to speak about Islam and the Gospel, and this time around we’ll focus especially on practical wisdom for presenting Christ to our Muslim neighbors. The night starts at 7:30. Q&A will follow. See you there!

Why does prayer work?

I meant to post this last week, since it goes with the study on how the the fact that God is a Trinity makes it possible for us to pray.

These are some amazing quotes from Andrew Murray on why prayer is possible at all–and it has to do with the nature of God. Check it out and get blessed…

…And so there was in the very Being and Life of God an asking of which prayer on earth was to be the reflection and the outflow. It was not without including this that Jesus said, “I knew that Thou always hearest me.” Just as the Sonship of Jesus on earth may not be separated from His Sonship in heaven, even so with His prayer on earth, it is the continuation and the couterpart of His asking in heaven. The prayer of the man Christ Jesus is the link between the eternal asking of the only-begotten Son in the bosom of the Father and the prayer of men upon earth.

Prayer has its rise and its deepest source in the very Being of God.

In the bosom of Deity nothing is ever done without prayer–the asking of the Son and the giving of the Father.

One of the secret difficulties with regard to prayer–one which, though not expressed, does often really hinder prayer–is derived from the perfection of God, in His absolute independence of all that is outside of Himself. Is He not the Infinite Being who owes what He is to Himself alone, who determines Himself, and whose wise and holy will has determined all that is to be? How can prayer influence Him, or He be moved by prayer to do what otherwise would not be done? Is not the promise of an answer to prayer simply a condescension to our weakness? Is what is said of the power…of prayer anything more than an accommodation to our mode of thought, because the Deity never can be dependent on any action from without for its doings? And is not the blessing of prayer simply the influence it exercises upon ourselves?

In seeking an answer to such questions, we find the key in the very being of God, in the mystery of the Holy Trinity.

If God was only one Person, shut up within Himself, there could be no thought of nearness to Him or influence on Him.

But in God there are three Persons. In God we have Father and Son, who have in the Holy Spirit their living bond of unity and fellowship. When eternal Love begat the Son, and the Father gave the Son as the Second Person a place next Himself as His Equal and His Counsellor, there was a way opened for prayer and its influence in the very inmost life of Deity itself. Just as on earth, so in heaven the whole relation between Father and Son is that of giving and taking.

These quotes are in Fred Sanders’ book The Deep Things of God. Sanders goes on to explain a little more what he sees in Murray’s thinking:

Crucial for Murray was to resist the urge to think of some will of God that is antecedent to the Son and the Father, or some decision that was made behind the back of the Trinity, in the oneness of God that is not already triune. There is no such God, so there is no such divine will. The divine will is Trinitarian and is worked out according to the asking-and-granting structure revealed in the Son: This may help us somewhat to understand how the prayer of man, coming through the Son, can have effect upon God.

The decrees of God are not decisions made by Him without reference to the Son, or His petition, or the petition to be sent up through Him. By no means.

The Lord Jesus is the first-begotten, the Head and Heir of all things: all things were created through Him and unto Him, and all things consist in Him. In the counsels of the Father, the Son, as Representative of all creation, had always a voice; in the decrees of the eternal purpose there was always room left for the liberty of the Son as Mediator and Intercessor, and so for the petitions of all who draw nigh to the Father in the Son.